You can submit your article, report, announcement, ad etc. by mailing to

Crossing the Border of Impersonalism

Tuesday, 20 November 2012 / Published in Articles / 2,751 views

By Abhaya Mudra Dasi

Iron Lust into Golden Love

Where does the border lie between impersonalism and personalism? Who is the guardian of that border and who permits crossing the border from the impersonal to the personal understanding of the Supreme Abssolute Truth? He is the bona fide spiritual master who drags us from the darkness of ignorance, as exemplified by the mayavadi’s illusiory concept of a senseless Godhead, towards an understanding of Krishna and His devotees through devotional service.

The meanings of personalism and impersonalism may seem clear when the subject is discussed in theory, but in practice these two understandings of eterna existence seem to intertwine and confound the inexperienced spiritual practitioner. The answer lies in how we approcath the Supreme Absolute Truth. While espousing the cause of a personal Godhead, neophytes are often seen to behave in a way that reveals longstanding impersonal roots. To understand the highest concept of personalism, let us see how Shrila Prabhupada describes the relationship of Krishna’s foremost devotees, the gopis of Vrindavana, to the Supreme Lord. And then let us consider how these compare with the relationships between materialistic women and men. Understanding this comparison is essential for realizing the difference between the ultimate reality of personalism and the utterly materialistic falsehood of impersonalism.

Shrila Prabhupada says in his Purport to Shrimad Bhagavatam 7.1.31,

Chaitanya Charitamrita compares the desires of the spiritual and material world to gold and iron. Both gold and iron are metal, but there is a vast difference in their value. The lusty desires of the gopis for Krishna are compared to gold, and material lusty desires are compared to iron.”

In the relationship between the gopis and Shri Krishna, we find all the expressions that are commonly used even by materialistic men and women. To eyes that are polluted by material desires, the bond between the gopis and Shri Krishna appears to reflect the dealings that are conducted by the conditioned living entities. The visayi or sense gratifier, whose eyes are like peacock feathers, sees no difference in the sharing each others’ thoughts, their embracing and dancing together. But as we can see from the above example the quality of these activities—though they appear identical to the body-conscious—are as different as iron from gold.

We live in the Iron Age when the most popular metal is iron. Iron is a good conductor of electricity and attracts a magnet. But its durability is weakened and eroded by water. Gold, unlike iron, does not react to magnetism and it does not become eroded in water. And gold is even a better conductor of electricity. Gold lasts for a very long time. In Satya Yuga when all living entitles were paramhamsas this was the most used metal in the world. Gold is also the favorite metal of the demigods who are also pious living enmities.

Upon examining the qualities of gold and iron we find that durability and beauty are the most important differences between the two metals. Gold, unlike iron, is prized for how it can be shaped, its malleability. The most beautiful jewelery is fashioned from gold. The connection between a materialistic man and woman is compared to iron because that bond is based around the senses of a dead and impersonal material body. In such materialistic relationships there is little room for flexibility, for durability or for beauty because the essential element of personalism, the identiy of the eternal spiritual particle, is lacking.

As succintly described by Shrila Prabhupada in the above verse, the highest level of personal relationships between Shri Krishna and His devotees is seen by the devotion of the gopis of Vrindavana. It is a fact that for any relationship to achieve the most refined element of personal exchange, that relationship must be centered upon the lotus feet of Shri Krishna. Personalism can only exist in relation to Shri Krishna. In other words, the iron of material passions becomes transformed into gold when reposed in the service of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

The Bhaktivedanta Purport to Shri Chaitanya Charitamrita (Madhya.8.187) instructs:

“We should always remember that Krishna’s sense gratification is never to be compared to the sense gratification of the material world. As we have already explained, Krishna’s sense gratification is just like gold. The perverted reflection of that sense gratification found in the material world is just like iron. The purport is that Krishna is not impersonal. He has all the desires that are manifest in the perverted reflection within this material world. However, the qualities are different—one is spiritual and the other is material. Just as there is a difference between life and death, there is a difference between spiritual sense gratification and material sense gratification.”

Most devotees are aware of the three levels of spiritual realization as will be explained hereunder. Personalism exists mainly on the Bhagavan realization of the Supreme Lord. The level of Paramatma realization is a mix of a personal and impersonal relationship. The Supreme Lord as Paramatma guides the soul as a teacher. The living entity can either have a respectful relationship with the indwelling Guru when he knows about His existence or he can be totally unaware of the Supersoul as it is the case of nearly all conditioned living entities. Pure impersonalism is seen at the level of Brahman realization and it is for that reason it is called impersonal Brahman. The brhamajyoti is non-different from the Supreme Personality of Godhead because it represents the all pervading light emanating from His body. Nonetheless, the Brahman platform does not permit the living entity to see the face of the Supreme Lord. This is due to distance or gap created in the relationship between the Supreme Lord and the individual jiva soul. The living entity who acts on the impersonal level is not close enough to the Lord to be able to interact with Him. How the distance in the relationship between the living entity and the Supreme Lord creates different realities of interaction is given by Shrila Prabhupada in Bhagavad Gita As It Is (2.22, purport):

“‘The Absolute Truth is realized in three phases of understanding by the knower of the Absolute Truth, and all of them are identical. Such phases of the Absolute Truth are expressed as Brahman, Paramātmā, and Bhagavan.’ (SB. 1.2.11) These three divine aspects can be explained by the example of the sun, which also has three different aspects, namely the sunshine, the sun’s surface and the sun planet itself. One who studies the sunshine only is the preliminary student. One who understands the sun’s surface is further advanced. And one who can enter into the sun planet is the highest. Ordinary students who are satisfied by simply understanding the sunshine-its universal pervasiveness and the glaring effulgence of its impersonal nature-may be compared to those who can realize only the Brahman feature of the Absolute Truth. The student who has advanced still further can know the sun disc, which is compared to knowledge of the Paramātmā feature of the Absolute Truth. And the student who can enter into the heart of the sun planet is compared to those who realize the personal features of the Supreme Absolute Truth. Therefore, the bhaktas, or the transcendentalists who have realized the Bhagavan feature of the Absolute Truth, are the topmost transcendentalists, although all students who are engaged in the study of the Absolute Truth are engaged in the same subject matter. The sunshine, the sun disc and the inner affairs of the sun planet cannot be separated from one another, and yet the students of the three different phases are not in the same category.”

Furthermore, in his Bhaktivedanta Purport to Gita 4.24, His Divine Grace explains how the material world is compared to covered brahmajyoti:

“Brahman means spiritual. The Lord is spiritual, and the rays of His transcendental body are called brahmajyoti, His spiritual effulgence. Everything that exists is situated in that brahmajyoti, but when the jyoti is covered by illusion (Maya) or sense gratification, it is called material. This material veil can be removed at once by Krishna consciousness…”

The difference between brahmajyoti and the material world is that in the material world the living entity is permitted to act upon his desires. And he can do so in such a way there is a chance for him to understand the higher levels of personal relationships a living entity ultimately can share with the Supreme Personality of Godhead Shri Krishna. The material world exists in order to offer the conditioned living entities a chance to revive their dormant relationship with the Supreme Lord. This world is the penitentiary of Maya Devi and—as every jail—it is a place for the purification and repentance of the prisoners. There is a chance for redemption from the material world, yet the only person who gives the liberation from the prison is the owner of the prison as described in the Bhaktivedanta Purport to Shrimad Bhagavatam 1.2.23:

“The prison house of the material world is created by Brahma under instruction of the Personality of Godhead, and at the conclusion of a kalpa the whole thing is destroyed by Shiva. But as far as maintenance of the prison house is concerned, it is done by Vishnu, as much as the state prison house is maintained by the state. Anyone, therefore, who wishes to get out of this prison house of material existence, which is full of miseries like repetition of birth, death, disease and old age, must please Lord Vishnu for such liberation.”

Whether concerning the material and spiritual worlds the topmost authority is Shri Krishna. In order to re-establish the personal relationship between Him and the living entities, He descends into the material world. Then by hearing about His pastimes from the lotus lips of His authorized representative, the pure devotee, the living entity himself becomes purified. As he unveils his eternal personal relationship with the Lord by the blessings of the bona fide spiritual master, he becomes qualified to go back to home, back to Godhead.

In the material world the activities of the living entities are limited in the same way the activities of the inmates are limited inside a prison house. Anyone who enters the limits of a prison house can understand that it is governed by an arrangement of hard and fast rules. In the same way, the relationship between a man and a woman in the material world is also limited, much like in a prison. Their relationship functions in the jurisdictions of the impersonal brahmajoti and such relations express impersonalism to the core. The relationships between the conditioned living entities are mutually dictated by their self-centered desires. At the center of all material desire is sex. The fleeting moment of so-called pleasure experienced in sex is a reflection of spiritual pleasure in just the same way that this material world is a reflection of the spiritual world. Again, the main characteristic of the material world is that it is a covered brahmajyoti and for this reason it is also impersonal. Yet, the material world, being a covered brahman, is also in a certain ‘‘covered” way spiritual since the brahmajyoti emanates from the ever-blissful body of the Supreme Lord. Any pleasure found in the material world carries the same characteristics of covered or perverted reflections of personalism. This is one of the first points explained by Shrila Prabhupada in outlining his vast Shrimad Bhagavatam project, for in his purport to 1.1.1 we find:

“Shrila Vishwanath Chakravarti Thakura specifically deals with the original and pure sex psychology (adi-rasa), devoid of all mundane inebriety. The whole material creation is moving under the principle of sex life. In modern civilization, sex life is the focal point for all activities. Wherever one turns his face, he sees sex life predominant. Therefore, sex life is not unreal. Its reality is experienced in the spiritual world. The material sex life is but a perverted reflection of the original fact. The original fact is in the Absolute Truth, and thus the Absolute Truth cannot be impersonal. It is not possible to be impersonal and contain pure sex life. Consequently, the impersonalist philosophers have given indirect impetus to the abominable mundane sex life because they have overstressed the impersonality of the ultimate truth. Consequently, man without information of the actual spiritual form of sex has accepted perverted material sex life as the all in all. There is a distinction between sex life in the diseased material condition and spiritual sex life.”

Thus, even in the material world the highest pleasure is sex, although it exists here only in a perverted form. And it is always the highest pleasures that a living entity is attracted to although the ultimate pleasures of the spiritual world become the lowest. Krishna explains this to Arjuna with His famous banyan tree example. The highest point of a tree is the lowest point in its reflection as explained by Shrila Prabhupada in his Introduction to Bhagavad Gita As It Is:

“The Supreme Lord said: There is a banyan tree which has its roots upward and its branches down, and the Vedic hymns are its leaves. One who knows this tree is the knower of the Vedas.” (BG 15.1) Here the material world is described as a tree whose roots are upwards and branches are below. We have experience of a tree whose roots are upward: if one stands on the bank of a river or any reservoir of water, he can see that the trees reflected in the water are upside down. The branches go downward and the roots upward. Similarly, this material world is a reflection of the spiritual world. The material world is but a shadow of reality. In the shadow there is no reality or substantiality, but from the shadow we can understand that there is substance and reality.”

But in order to regain one’s original personal identity, a living entity has to renounce his self-centered sex desire. In other words, this means that the individual soul must renounce impersonalism and in this way renounce forever the prison house of the material world. This material world is only good for renunciation. This is its purpose. For many devotional aspirants the thorny issue of sex life presents a double standard. Due to conditioning many believe that sex is natural and necessary, and that it cannot be renounced. Herein lies the point of confusion between impersonalism and personalism.

All that is related to Shri Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead is personal. When devotees associate with other devotees, the eternal connection with Shri Krishna is also activated, or rather re-activiated. Shared personal relationships between Shri Krishna’s devotees is always beneficial because it is the training ground for re-newing our personal relationship with Shri Krishna. In Bhagavad Gita (18.68) Shri Krishna tells Arjuna that He derives such pleasure from those who preach His message that such preachers will find their way back to home back to Godhead:

ya idam paramam guhyam mad-bhaktesv abhidhasyati

bhaktim mayi param kritva mam evaisyaty asamsayah

“For one who explains the supreme secret tothedevotees, devotional service is guaranteed, and at the end he will come back to Me.”

For Devotees, Shared Love is Love for Shri Krishna

Although all love should be directed to Shri Krishna still devotees must remain in the company of one another. This is the verdict of all shastras as verified by Shri Krishnadas Kaviraja Goswami himself (CC Madhya 22.54):

sadhu-sangha sadhu-sangha sarva shastra koy

lava matra sadhu-sangha sarva-siddhi hoy

“The verdict of all revealed scriptures is that by even a moment’s association with a pure devotee, one can attain all success.”

When devotees associate their Krishna-centered devotional sentiments are shared amongst themselves. The Lord’s servants perfect the art of loving devotional service to Shri Krishna through relating to one another. It is not that in the spiritual world devotees will disappear and will one day only relate to Shri Krishna. The company of the Lord’s devotees is one of the opulences of the Shri Krishna. As Shrila Prabhupada says, “We have to seek the association of such devotees. For this reason we have begun the International Society for Krishna Consciousness.”

The awakened living entity is always receiving knowledge while the position of the Supreme Lord is to be all-knowledgeable. Thus we can never avoid other devotees, nor can we avoid the training we receive from them as agents of the Supreme Lord. Because the devotees continue to associate with each other in the spiritual world the qualities of gold—or personalism—also exist in the relationship between two pure devotees. For those who are not sufficiently purified, the neophytes, there can get be a sort of iron and gold mixture in relationships. This can be quite unpleasant because iron and gold simply do not mix. In the Bhaktivedanta Purport to BG 3.37 Shrila Prabhupada states:

“When a living entity comes in contact with the material creation, his eternal love for Krishna is transformed into lust, in association with the mode of passion. Or, in other words, the sense of love of God becomes transformed into lust, as milk in contact with sour tamarind is transformed into yogurt. Then again, when lust is unsatisfied, it turns into wrath; wrath is transformed into illusion, and illusion continues the material existence. Therefore, lust is the greatest enemy of the living entity, and it is lust only which induces the pure living entity to remain entangled in the material world. Wrath is the manifestation of the mode of ignorance; these modes exhibit themselves as wrath and other corollaries. If, therefore, the modes of passion, instead of being degraded into the modes of ignorance, are elevated to the modes of goodness by the prescribed method of living and acting, then one can be saved from the degradation of wrath by spiritual attachment.”

So should devotees renounce sex or not? Since the entire world is under its spell as long as one has material body he will find it difficult to renounce sex. Therefore the secret lies in the art of transformation. Shrila Prabhupada often gives the example that iron can be transformed into gold through the agency of a touchstone. In the same way, through association with a pure devotee, material desires become transformed into personal relationships with the Lord and his devotees.

In this way a sadhu’s transcendental affection for the Lord and His devotees may appear as iron to the worldly even though the quality of his relationships are gold. But there is danger in the opposite scenario also. A man may pretend to be on the purified level to exploit innocent living entities for sex. In other words, while pretending to be gold his qualities are actually iron-like. In a letter of 4 January 1973 to his disciple Madhukara das, Shrila Prabhupada warned of the consequences of such convenient relationships:

“Householder life means wife, children, home, these things are understood by everyone, why our devotees have taken it as something different? They simply have some sex desire, get themselves married, and when the matter does not fulfill their expectations, immediately there is separation—these things are just like material activities, prostitution. The wife is left without husband, and sometimes there is child to be raised, in so many ways the proposition that you, and some others also, are making becomes distasteful.

“We cannot expect that our temples will become places of shelter for so many widows and rejected wives, that will be a great burden and we shall become the laughingstock in the society. There will be unwanted progeny also. And there will be illicit sex life; that we are seeing already. And being the weaker sex, women require to have a husband who is strong in Krishna consciousness so that they may take advantage and make progress by sticking tightly to his feet. If their husband goes away from them, what will they do? So many instances are already there in our Society, so many frustrated girls and boys.

“So I have introduced this marriage system in your Western countries because there is custom of freely intermingling male and female. Therefore marriage required just to engage the boys and girls in devotional service, never mind distinction of living status. But our marriage system is little different than in your country, we do not sanction the policy of quick divorce. We are supposed to take husband or wife as eternal companion or assistant in Krishna consciousness service, and there is promise never to separate.”

Such results as Shrila Prabhupada outlined above are produced when there is immaturity in discriminating personalism from impersonalism. A gold quality relationship can never occur between an advanced devotee and a materialist. Such relationships can be compared to a fool’s gold. The pyrite or false gold stone ignites illusions for wealth into the hearts of the inexperienced gold diggers, especially those who are looking for easy spiritual advancement. Again, the quality of golden relationships can only occur in the company of advanced souls and in the service of the source of all purity, the Supreme Lord Shri Krishna. Pure golden relationships are very rare in this world and are practically inaccessible for the souls that are still struggling with material contamination.

For the sake of maintaining the sincere relationships amongst devotees, and to facilitate their advancement into relationships of genuine gold, householders must renounce illicit sex. By limiting sex desire one can keep his mind focused. When the mind can choose only the Supreme Lord in all of his activities one can move beyond the impersonal nature of sex desire and transform it into love. The difference between sex and love is that the first one is impersonal while the second one is personal. One is iron the other one is gold. For example devotees eat like everyone else, but only Krishna prasadam. There is no such necessity to renounce eating.

Transformation begins within the heart and is reflected into one’s surroundings. The transformation can further be extended in ones family between a husband and a wife. It is said that Shrila Gaura Kishora das Babaji advised one man to accept his wife as a guru and thus advance in his relationship with Shri Krishna. He himself called his wife “Matajee as the mother is supposed to be the guru of her children. Babaji Maharaja spoke thus to a newly married man:

“A Vaishnava wife is extremely rare and difficult to find in this world. If one has the good fortune of having one, he should see it as a benediction from Krishna. The wife worships the husband as her lord and master. Similarly, the husband should worship the wife because she is Krishna dasi, a servant of Krishna. In this way, the husband can protect his devotional enthusiasm not by considering his wife to be his maidservant, but she is always the maidservant of Krishna.”

This advice is essential. When one can curb his false ego and accept his fellow devotee as a guru then he may advance to the level of a golden relationship. How can someone accept his wife as a guru? Essentially, anyone who gives us Shri Krishna is our guru. In the spiritual world sometimes we can see that a son or a daughter is the guru of their parents. The cowherd boys who play with Shri Krishna connect their parents with the Supreme Lord because the boys have a closer relationship with Shri Krishna. The parents are always superior to their children but in relation to Shri Krishna they have to accept their boys or girls as the link. Even considering that a husband is superior to his wife, he can still accept her as a guru or as a link to Shri Krishna if she is Krishna conscious. This instruction also applies to all women, although in general a devotee wife does not have a problem accepting her husband as guru. Shrila Prabhupada explains,

“Well, if he is bad, how can he become a guru? [Laughter.] How can iron become gold? Actually, a guru cannot be bad, for if someone is bad, he cannot be a guru. You cannot say ‘bad guru.’ That is a contradiction. What you have to do is simply try to understand what a genuine guru is. The definition of a genuine guru is that he is simply talking about God—that’s all. If he’s talking about some other nonsense, then he is not a guru. A guru cannot be bad. There is no question of a bad guru, any more than a red guru or a white guru. Guru means ‘genuine guru.’ All we have to know is that the genuine guru is simply talking about God and trying to get people to become God’s devotees. If he does this, he is genuine.” (The Science of Self Realization: SSR 2: Choosing a Spiritual Master: What Is a Guru?)

When two devotees in a family accept each other as gurus or links to Shri Krishna then they can further progress and share a golden quality relationship between each other because Shri Krishna is always in their company. Thus, they have successfully transformed mundane desires into love.

Warning: The transformation of iron to gold is a simple process but also a rare one. Iron can be transformed into gold but pure gold can never become iron. So someone who wishes to become gold has to understand that the process is irrevocable. In a lecture on Bhagavad Gita delivered on 13 February 1969 Shrila Prabhupada summed up this process:

So how you can do that? The same example: You have to keep the iron constantly with the fire. You have to keep yourself constantly in Krishna consciousness. Then even your this body, material body, is spiritualized.”


  1. 0
    Puskaraksa das ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

    Nectar of Devotion 31:

    Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī says that although he has no expert knowledge about the sounds and meanings and mellows of the symptoms of ecstatic love, he has tried to give some examples of different varieties of love of Kṛṣṇa. He further states that the thirty-three disturbing symptoms of ecstatic love, plus eight other symptoms, all taken together equal forty-one primary symptoms of ecstatic love. These symptoms create transformations of bodily activities as well as movements of the senses. All of them can be accepted as different feelings of the heart. Sometimes some of the feelings are quite natural. Sometimes some of the feelings are just temporary appearances. Those symptoms which are very natural always remain, both within and without the devotee.

    As one can detect the color of dye a cloth was soaked in by looking at the cloth, so, simply by understanding the different signs of these symptomatic features, one can understand the actual position. In other words, attachment for Kṛṣṇa is one, but because there exist different kinds of devotees, such attachment is manifested in many varieties.

    As clothing tinged red appears red, so the temporary appearance of a certain type of feeling can be detected or observed by the specific ecstatic symptom. In fact, all the different humors and mellows of the devotees produce various specific feelings within the mind. And according to these differences, the symptoms of ecstatic love appear in different forms and degrees.

    If one’s heart is highly elevated, grave and magnanimous, or if one’s heart is rough and crude, different symptoms of ecstatic love will appear, influenced by the condition of the heart. Actually, people cannot generally understand such different qualities of mentality, but when one’s heart is very soft or gentle, these symptoms become very easily visible, and one can understand them very clearly.

    The heart of one who is highly elevated and grave is compared to gold. If one’s heart is very soft and gentle, his heart is compared to a cotton swab. When there is an ecstatic sensation within the mind, the golden heart or grave heart is not agitated, but the soft heart immediately becomes agitated.

  2. 0
    Puskaraksa das ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

    “To offer another example, a grave, magnanimous heart is compared to a great city, and a soft heart to an insignificant cottage. There may be many lights, or even great elephants in the big city, but no one will take particular notice of them. But when such lights or elephants are seen near a small cottage, everyone can distinctly point them out.

    A hard heart is compared to a lightning bolt, to gold and to shellac. The lightning bolt is very strong and never becomes soft. Similarly, the hearts of those who are engaged in severe austerities and penances do not become very easily softened. The golden heart becomes melted at high temperature, as in ecstatic love. And the shellac heart is very easily melted in slight temperature.

    A soft heart is compared to honey, to butter and to nectar. And the condition of the mind is compared to sunshine. As honey and butter become melted even in slight sunshine, softhearted persons become easily melted. Nectar, however, is by its nature always liquid. And the hearts of those who are in pure ecstatic love with Kṛṣṇa are by nature always liquified, just like nectar.

    A pure devotee of Kṛṣṇa is always specifically qualified with nectarean qualifications and sometimes with the qualifications of butter and honey. On the whole, the heart in any of the different conditions mentioned above can be melted under certain circumstances, just as a hard diamond is sometimes melted by a combination of certain chemicals.

    In the Dāna-keli-kaumudī it is stated, “When love develops in the heart of a devotee, he cannot check the transformation of his sentiments. His heart is just like the ocean at the rising of the moon, when the ebb tide cannot be checked: immediately there must be movement of high waves.” Although in its natural state the ocean is always grave and unfathomable, when the moon rises, nothing can check the ocean’s agitation. Similarly, those who are pure devotees cannot on any account check the movement of their feelings within.”

  3. 0
    bbd ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

    FYI – Alchemists have never managed to turn iron into gold.

    Many devotees seem to have this common misunderstanding that the spiritual world and material world are two different places. This is not the case as they both exist everywhere. The spiritual world is the perceived reality of the self realized soul. The material world is called an illusion because it exists within the minds of the conditioned souls. In the Bhagavatam, Kapila teaches that the source of the material elements is ahankara (false conception of reality). In other words the conditioned soul creates the material world because he doesn’t understand the true nature of reality, he sees it all as mundane. When ahankara is gone, the material world disappears, you realize that you are always with God, everywhere, within you and all around.

    SB 3.28.35: When the mind is thus completely freed from all material contamination and detached from material objectives, it is just like the flame of a lamp. At that time the mind is actually dovetailed with that of the Supreme Lord and is experienced as one with Him because it is freed from the interactive flow of the material qualities.

    SB 3.28.36: Thus situated in the highest transcendental stage, the mind ceases from all material reaction and becomes situated in its own glory, transcendental to all material conceptions of happiness and distress. At that time the yogī realizes the truth of his relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He discovers that pleasure and pain as well as their interactions, which he attributed to his own self, are actually due to the false ego, which is a product of ignorance.

    SB 11.28.6-7: The Supersoul alone is the ultimate controller and creator of this world, and thus He alone is also the created. Similarly, the Soul of all existence Himself both maintains and is maintained, withdraws and is withdrawn. No other entity can be properly ascertained as separate from Him, the Supreme Soul, who nonetheless is distinct from everything and everyone else. The appearance of the threefold material nature, which is perceived within Him, has no actual basis. Rather, you should understand that this material nature, composed of the three modes, is simply the product of His illusory potency.

  4. 0
    pustakrishna ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

    Knowledge which is speculative, ascending from our own faulty intellect, will arrive at the impersonal conception of truth. Even seasoned devotees will sometimes ask: “But where does Krishna come from?” Knowledge of the truth must come from descent, from Krishna ultimately. That there is no truth superior to Krishna, is the case. It is the expression of all, including all the great sages, and Krishna Himself, that the brahma-jyoti, brahman, is the spiritual effulgence of the supreme Lord’s Form. It is existing simultaneously and is non-dual. vidanti tat tattva vidas…..advayam (nondual). We are not enemies of the impersonal aspect of Sri Krishna, as it is His effulgence. But, we are advocates of devotion and loving exchange with Krishna, as you have pointed out. You have pointed out incorrectly however that Personalism is based mostly on the Bhagavan conception, and that “Paramatma realisation is a mix of personal and impersonal relationship.” Please understand that this is incorrect. In the spiritual sky, Vaikuntha, many four-handed forms of the Supreme Lord are predominating Deities of Vaikuntha planets where countless jiva souls, also with four-arms, dwell in devotional service with Him. This is fully personalism, and not at all tinged with impersonalism. The Paramatma form of four-armed Vishna accompanies every jiva soul through their sojourn and permits and guides all things. It is not tinged by impersonalism. Simply, Bhagavan, the original form of God, possesses qualities, described by Srila Rupa Goswami, that are unique to Krishna in His Bhagavan aspect. This does not diminish the importance of the Vishnu forms. In some ways, based on Panca-tattva of Sri Chaitanya, the Vishnu forms also appear to be subservient to Bhagavan, the Supreme Enjoyer. We have seen how Sri Balaram and Sri Nityananda, although highest Vishnu tattva, assist Krishna in His lilas.
    Since, as Mahaprabhu describes in the Madhyalila, the Supreme Lord, Sri Krishna, expands Himself as Vishu tattva and jiva tattva forms. But, we should not think that Vishnu-tattva is tinged by any impersonality, simply because it does not reach to the Bhagavan aspect of Godhead. His origin is Bhagavan. Lord Vishnu is a Person, as you and I are persons as well. He is in the category of Godhead and our sanatan dharma is as eternal servants of Godhead. See through shastra….Pusta Krishna das

  5. 0
    Abhaya Mudra Dasi ( User Karma: -9 ) says:

    “Impersonal Brahman is incomplete realization of the absolute whole, and so also is the conception of Paramatma in the Twelfth Chapter.” (Bhagavad Gita As It Is, Introduction)

    Dear Pushta Krishna Prabhu,

    You have presented your point intelligently.
    Now, how Paramatma is a partially impersonal and partially personal is explained by Shrila Prabhupada thusly:

    “The shanta-rati realization of Krishna is in the neutral stage between the conception of impersonalism and personalism. This means that one is not very strongly attached to the personal feature of the Lord. An appreciation of the greatness of the Lord is called shanta-rati. This is attachment not to the personal feature but to the impersonal feature. Generally, one in this stage is attached to the Paramatma feature of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” (-CC Madhya-lila 19.183-184, Purport)

    And to further elaborate on the subject of your comment, of course you are correct that there are many planets in the spiritual world that are controlled by the Chaturvyuha form of the Supreme Lord. However there Chaturvyuha are forms (expansions) of Lord Narayana. Those who worship them are personalist. Shri Vishnu is an expansion of Narayana and is the predominating deity of the material world.

    “Krishna expands as Sankarshana, Narayana, Vishnu, Maha-Vishnu, Garbhodakashayi Vishnu and Kshirodakashayi Vishnu.” (-Teachings of Lord Kapila Vs 3, Purport)


  6. 0
    Abhaya Mudra Dasi ( User Karma: -9 ) says:

    As the material world is covered Brahmajyoti, so to a great extent is the Deity of this material world. It is not that we feel that Lord Vishnu is impersonal. That is out of the question. But the knowledge of the living entities in this world about Vishnu is limited. He exists in the heart of all living entities in this world, but they are unaware of His existence (until they become devotees). Shrila Prabhupada explains the difference between between Paramatma and Narayana:

    “When He is realized in His impersonal form He is called the Supreme Brahman, when realized as the Paramatma He is called antaryami, and when He expands Himself in different forms for material creation He is called Kshirodakashayi Vishnu, Garbhodakashayi Vishnu and Karanodakashayi Viṣṇu. When He is realized as Vasudeva, Sankarshana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha—the Chaturvyuha, who are beyond the three forms of Viṣṇu—He is the Vaikuntha Narayaṇa. Above realization of Narayana is realization of Baladeva, and above that is realization of Kṛṣṇa.” (-SB 6.9.33, Purport)

    Devotees, who are all personalists, meditate on the Paramatma as Shri Krishna or another personal form of the Lord. For the devotee the material world is not exactly material anymore. Such mahabhagavatas have crossed the border of impersonalism to personalism. Thus they see Paramatma according to their personal realization.

    Your servant,
    Abhaya Mudra Dasi

  7. 0
    Puskaraksa das ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

    Sri Brahma-samhita. 5.38

    I worship Govinda, the primeval Lord, who is Syamasundara, Krishna Himself with inconceivable innumerable attributes, whom the pure devotees see in their heart of hearts with the eye of devotion tinged with the salve of love.

    The Syamasundara form of Krishna is His inconceivable simultaneous personal and impersonal self-contradictory form. True devotees see that form in their purified hearts under the influence of devotional trance. The form Syama is not the blue color visible in the mundane world but is the transcendental variegated color affording eternal bliss, and is not visible to the mortal eye. On a consideration of the trance of Vyasadeva as in the sloka, bhakti-yogena manasi etc., it will be clear that the form of Sri Krishna is the full Personality of Godhead and can only be visible in the heart of a true devotee, which is the only true seat in the state of trance under the influence of devotion. When Krishna manifested Himself in Vraja, both the devotees and nondevotees saw Him with this very eye; but only the devotees cherished Him, eternally present in Vraja, as the priceless jewel of their heart. Nowadays also the devotees see Him in Vraja in their hearts, saturated with devotion although they do not see Him with their eyes. The eye of devotion is nothing but the eye of the pure unalloyed spiritual self of the jiva. The form of Krishna is visible to that eye in proportion to its purification by the practice of devotion. When the devotion of the neophyte reaches the stage of bhava-bhakti the pure eye of that devotee is tinged with the salve of love by the grace of Krishna, which enables him to see Krishna face to face. The phrase “in their hearts” means Krishna is visible in proportion as their hearts are purified by the practice of devotion. When the devotion of the neophyte reaches the stage of bhava-bhakti the pure eye of that devotee is tinged with the salve of love by the grace of Krishna, which enables him to see Krishna face to face. The phrase “in their hearts” means Krishna is visible in proportion as their hearts are purified by the practice of devotion. The sum and substance of this sloka is that the form of Krishna, who is Syamasundara, Natavara (Best Dancer), Muralidhara (Holder of the Flute) and Tribhanga (Triple-bending), is not a mental concoction but is transcendental, and is visible with the eye of the soul of the devotee under trance.

  8. 0
    pustakrishna ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

    I would like to share a perspective of the Supreme Lord within the heart that may help us to appreciate the proximity (nearness) of the Supreme Person. We are familiar with the expression of Krishna in the last verse of the 6th. chapter of His Bhagavad GIta. Yoginam api sarvesam…off all yogis, best is one who is meditating upon the Supreme Lord within one’s heart. There is a very thought-provoking Christian preacher whose name is Charles Stanley. I was not born a Christian but I appreciate the eclectic contributions that the environment and others can offer in search for Sri Krishna. The conception of the “Holy Spirit” is that the Person, God, has taken up residence in your heart. It is not like a projection with mirrors, but rather, the Person Himself is present. His infinite capacity to Personally interact with everything gives rise to the fact that the Lord is able to Personally interact in a different manner with each and every being during their sojourn. He is witness and permitter (eko bahunam yo vidhadhati kaman). He is interacting differently with you, with me, and the next persons or beings. Krishna similarly has demonstrated this capacity in Goloka, where we are informed that He can expand Himself to dance with countless gopis, or play individually with countless gopas (cowherd boys), and the like each experiencing the unique sweetness of personal relationship with Krishna.
    The Personality of Godhead is fully independent and is “raso vai sah” or the vortex of all sweet loving transcendental exchanges. He is primordial, original, unborn, the origin of all, and His bodily effulgence is the brahma-jyoti. He can grant one the vision of His beautiful form by His own sweet independence, and those blessed with love for Him will be lost in love for Krishna, Krishna consciousness, forgetting oneself as no longer falsely independent of Him, but rather fully feel that I am His, and He is mine. As such, it is He Who is the supreme Subjective being, and all is meant for His pleasure…yet His sweet nature extends also to “our senses” which truly are expansions of His own (hriskesa hrishikena sevanam bhaktir ucyate).
    Although a formless aspect of God exists as His divine effulgence, it is mayayapahrita jnanam, those whose intelligence is stolen by illusion who conceive of the impersonal as being the source of everything. These voidists embrace heart hardened misconception. This is due to misfortune. Pusta Krishna das

  9. 0
    Abhaya Mudra Dasi ( User Karma: -9 ) says:

    Dear Pushta Krishna Prabhu,

    You are correct that Shri Krishna is always the Supreme Personality of Godhead and He shares different relation with every living entity. Yet, the conditioned living entity cannot see Him although he is right there in the heart.

    When the conditioned jiva purifies himself of the dust covering his heart for countless births, he can see Shri Krishna in one of His Chaturvuha forms or as the original Shri Krishna. You, me and all devotees from the Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition, who are followers of Shri Chaitaya Mahaprabhu, purify our hearts by chanting the Hare Krishna mahamantra. By doing so we may become privileged to see Paramatma within the heart as Shri Krishna Himself. As Lord Chitanya Mahaprabhu has instructed (Shikshastaka 1)

    cheto-darpana-marjanam bhava-maha-davagni-nirvapanam
    shreyah-kairava-chandrika-vitaranam vidya-vadhu-jivanam
    anandambhdhi-vardhanam prati-padam purnamritasvadanam
    sarvatma-snapanam param vijayate shri-krishna-sankirtanam

    “Glory to the Shri Krishna sankirtana which cleanses the heart of all the dust accumulated for years and extinguishes the fire of conditional life, of repeated birth and death. That sankirtana movement is the prime benediction for humanity at large because it spreads the rays of the benediction moon. It is the life of all transcendental knowledge. It increases the ocean of transcendental bliss, and it enables us to fully taste the nectar for which we are always anxious.”


  10. 0
    Abhaya Mudra Dasi ( User Karma: -9 ) says:

    We should understand that a devotee on the Bhagavan platform and another on the Paramatma level see Paramatma differently. The yogis, or those who specifically are attached to the Supersoul realization, are those who see the Lord in shanta rasa and that rasa is essentially impersonal as described by Shrila Prabhupada (in the quote I gave in my previous posting). A devotee who knows Shri Krishna sees Him everywhere, in the heart, and also acknowledges His separate personal existence. This is because essentially all three features–impersonal, localized and personal– of the Supreme Lord are inseparable for one who has achieved the Bhagavan platform of realization. The Supreme Lord is perfect and complete and everything exists within Him. It is not surprising that you, Pushta Krishna Prabhu, as a devotee of the personal form of Shri Krishna do not accept that He can be perceived in an impersonal way in the heart. But we should understand that there are different grades of living entities in this material world and they are by no means pure. In other words, they have no ability to see the ever blissful Supreme Personality of Godhead Shri Krishna as a person sitting within their own hearts. As Vaishnavas we have to be merciful upon them. We need to be able to explain the different features of the Lord, and in this way apply the knowledge of Shrimad Bhagavatam and Bhagavad Gita practically for the pleasure of our previous acharyas.

    Your servant,
    Abhaya Mudra Dasi

Leave a Reply