By Aindra Das
Devotee: Iâ€™m wondering about Srila Prabhupadaâ€™s whole endeavor and focus â€“ how much endeavor it was to present Krishna consciousness purely, not kaitava-dharma. He wanted to give Srimad-Bhagavatam. Still, after a few years, after the â€™70s, we can see that he started to speak more about varnasrama-dharma and give it more emphasis. In the beginning devotees were asking, â€śSrila Prabhupada, arenâ€™t we transcendental to it?â€ť And Prabhupada said, â€śAre we? If they are Vaishnavas â€“ why are they falling down?â€ť He wanted to establish a foundation for people to get more peace of mind, a more favorable position to engage in Krishna consciousness. Thatâ€™s what it seems like from what Iâ€™ve been reading from Prabhupada. So, how to understand this?
Aindra Prabhu: I have my own observations and take on that, which also requires that we address two aspects of a devoteeâ€™s life, particularly a preacherâ€™s life. If someone ordains himself as a preacher, then he has a prime responsibility and he has . . . letâ€™s not say a secondary, but a corollary responsibility.
The first and foremost responsibility of any preacher is to himself be fully self-realized in order to be fully empowered to infuse bhakti-sakti in the hearts of the people heâ€™s associating with or endeavoring to preach to. If that is lacking, then we question whether or not we are Vaishnavas. It is not just that someone hears a little philosophy and then he parrots the philosophy at a college or whatever, that such is the actual substance that impresses anyone. He may be able to bamboozle someone intellectually, but he may not succeed in actually inculcating the essence of prema in the heart of that person in order to generate in him genuine pure devotional sraddha.
Varnasrama is meant for those who have no pure devotional sraddha. Pure devotional sraddha â€“ not bhava, not prema, but pure devotional sraddha. It is the basis of pure devotion. Because in his writings, Bhaktivinoda Thakur delineates â€“ rather scientifically â€“ the distinction between pure devotional sraddha, chaya-sraddha-abhasa, and pratibimba-sraddha-abhasa. Thereâ€™s a semblance of sraddha that many devotees may think is real sraddha but is actually not. Pure devotional sraddha, according to Bhaktivinoda Thakur, is synonymous with saranagati. And saranagati begins with accepting those things that are favorable for the cultivation of uttama-bhakti. Anyabhilashita-sunyam jnana-karmady-anavritam [Cc Madhya 19.167]. The main focal point of a devoteeâ€™s life is anukulyena krishnanu-silanam. So to accept the svarupa-laksana of pure devotion is the most essential. The svarupa-laksana is anukulyena krishnanu-silanam — that which is to be accepted. And to reject those things which are unfavorable. What does that mean? Anyabhilashita-sunyam jnana-karmady-anavritam.
To become fixed up in uttama-bhakti in order to actually realize the purport of bhagavata, or the import of bhagavata-dharma, the devotee has to actually be considerably focused. What does that mean? Sraddha-sabdhe â€“ visvasa sudridha niscaya [Cc Madhya 22.62] Sudridha. Dridha-vrata.
yesham tv anta-gatam papam
bhajante mam dridha-vratah
satatam kirtayanto mam
yatantas ca dridha-vratah
So, that firm determination. And not just any dridha-vrata but sudridha -vrata â€“ you know, sudridha niscaya . . . krishne bhakti kaile sarva-karma krita haya krishna [Cc Madhya 22.62]: that all my necessities of life â€“ my prime, most important necessities â€“ will be fulfilled simply by doing krishna-bhakti. And krishna-bhakti means suddha-bhakti, not misra-bhakti. So we need to recognize in our own lives that anything other than preaching the principles of pure devotional service is subsidiary. It is not the essence. These are conditional dharmas.
Many devotees have become bewildered by these instructions from Srila Prabhupada, thinking that the establishment of varnasrama-dharma is of utmost importance. But actually, the establishment of varnasrama-dharma was mostly . . . if you go through all of the recordings of Srila Prabhupadaâ€™s conversations with religionists and scientists, economists and what not, youâ€™ll hear how he again and again harped on the necessity for there to be a head on human society, that others will be able to function properly only if thereâ€™s a head to guide them. He was preaching against a class-less society, or communism, which is not class-less but basically is sudra society with a few administrators reaping at the expenses of everyone else, which proves that the concept is a virtual impossibility. So in this way, Prabhupada mostly focused his preaching to such kinds of people in the direction of â€śsub-religiousâ€ť principles, because varnasrama is a sub-religious principle; it is not a real religious principle.
Even here in Vrindavana, there were some morning walks when Prabhupada was discussing his idea of instituting varnasrama. His main purpose that I can understand â€“ although, as you pointed out, he said that if theyâ€™re Vaishnavas, why are they falling down? â€“ his main purpose was to set an example in the microcosm for the benefit of the macrocosm. That was his main intention.
Of course, in Sri Caitanya-caritamrita, as far as I remember, he mentions that varnasrama is only necessary â€“ it is not necessary, but it is only necessary â€“ to the extent that there are residues of the bodily conception of life. There are those amongst us in this Society who are determined to remain attached to their bodily conception of life. And they will determinately attach themselves to the upadhi of being a brahmacari, or the upadhi of being a sannyasi, parading around in their masquerade costumes, identifying with the particular role they are endeavoring to model for the benefit of others. But many, in spite of the fact that they were role-modeling as sannyasis or good little brahmacaris or grihasthas with redoubled preaching strength, fell away.
Itâ€™s not that Srila Prabhupada didnâ€™t introduce varnasrama, in the sense that certain individuals were accepting positions in various asramas practically from the very onset. By 1968, there was the idea among devotees of grihasthas, brahmacaris, and sannyasis. So they had their safety net to fall back on, in terms of human existence. Varnasrama is the beginning of human life, but did that stop them from falling down? Do you understand my point? Just the fact that someone is pigeon-holed as a brahmacari, grihastha, vanaprastha, or sannyasi doesnâ€™t guarantee that he is not going to become distracted from his pursuit of the ultimate goal of life.
As a matter of fact, my personal observation is that over the years, seeing how so many fell away in spite of the fact that they were big this, that, or the other varnasrama-wise, the reason they fell down is because they were not sufficiently encouraged to pursue the paro-dharma. They were already distracted, thinking that they had to involve themselves with conditional dharmas more than what was perhaps actually required, and thereby lost valuable time. In other words, the preaching didnâ€™t sufficiently impress upon them the need to progress. Iâ€™m not saying â€śPrabhupadaâ€™s preaching,â€ť although what others preached to us came from what Prabhupada was preaching. But anyone who wants to glean the essence of Krishna consciousness can do so by hearing from Srila Prabhupada. And many of the leaders in our movement became absorbed in conditional pursuits in terms of their idea that we had to set up varnasrama within our society, that we had to somehow or other, even though Prabhupada had said that to establish varnasrama in the context of the present demoniac leadership infrastructure of so-called civilization is a virtual impossibility, although quite necessary to rectify the ills of human society. It is not possible! Prabhupada said clearly that it was not possible. And he also offered the solution.
I say that if itâ€™s the solution for the macrocosm, then itâ€™s also a solution for the microcosm. It should be seen as the solution for the microcosm even before we apply it to the macrocosm. And that is to increase the piety, to force people to become pious, because itâ€™s for the people and by the people. But people are not pious; theyâ€™re a bunch of small dogs, animals, getting together and electing one big animal and glorifying him until they are ready to pull him off the throne. The blue jackal syndrome. But how to make them pious? How to increase their spiritual intelligence so that they can see things in proper perspective, see the distinction between the pure devotional ideal, or the Vedic ideal, and the present demoniac mundane wrangling, exploitative kind of government that is going on now?
Prabhupada told us that the solution to the problem is to perform mass harinama sankirtana and distribute books. But he specifically mentioned mass harinama sankirtana all over the world. Because the atmosphere that is surcharged with the influence of the Holy Name, with the sound of the Holy Name, and even the ethereal element in the atmosphere, is purified so much so that even after the sankirtana party has gone back to the temple, if people enter into the atmosphere where the sankirtana party was, they become purified of sinful reactions and gain piety. And not just any kind of piety, but bhakti-unmukhi-sukriti. They become more and more eligible to get sraddha, even pure devotional sraddha. Or at least sraddha-abhasa, which is somehow connected with Krishna consciousness. Then itâ€™s possible for them to recognize the need for superior Krishna conscious leadership in human society and vote God conscious leadership into office.
But devotees, hearing that Prabhupada had this desire to re-implement varnasrama in human society by setting up little varnasrama communities as an example for the rest of the world to follow, in their confusion they became, letâ€™s say, neglectful of the basic elementary process, which Srila Prabhupada instructed was necessary for varnasrama to ever be possible. And thatâ€™s to perform harinama sankirtana!
So all over the movement, especially after Prabhupada left, harinama sankirtana waned like anything, practically to the point where no one goes out on harinama sankirtana, except in a couple of places in the world, especially compared to the way it was when Prabhupada was here: devotees going out daily on harinama sankirtana, having maha-sankirtana processions in the thick of it on Friday and Saturday nights, on the week-ends.
In other words, the cart was put before the horse. Itâ€™s much harder for a horse to push a cart than it is for a horse to draw a cart. So the horse should go before the cart. Unless we become sufficiently purified from our attachments to all upadhis, sarvopadhi vinirmuktam, including the conceptions of oneself, the bodily conception, which would make it necessary for you to think in terms of entertaining varnasrama dharma even in the slightest. Unless we become purified of all these upadhis, weâ€™re not going to be able to be invested with the sakti, the spiritual realization, the cognizance of who we really are on the spiritual platform. Sa gunan samatityaitan brahma-bhuyaya kalpate (BG 14.26). How? Not by practicing varnasrama duties and all these things, but by bhakti-yogena sevate. Mam ca yo â€™vyabhicarena bhakti-yogena sevate means without deviating from that principle. Then sa gunan samatityaitan, attaining the transcendental platform, is possible.
In other words, there is no solution to anyoneâ€™s problems. Varnasrama is not the solution to anyoneâ€™s problems. It will never be the solution to the soulâ€™s problems. Varnasrama is only a stepping-stone to the extent that varnasrama actually fosters suddha-bhakti. If the suddha-bhakti principles are not being followed, then varnasrama is an anartha. Whether varnasrama or no varnasrama, the real substance has to be there for anything to be viable and real. And in Kali-yuga â€“ I hate to sound like a fanatic; I donâ€™t want people to brand me as being some kind of an old-timer, old-fashioned. But I dare say that Kali-yuga has hardly started, and for the whole 432,000 years of Kali-yuga â€“ not just for the first 4,500 years, taking it up to about the time when Lord Caitanya and his associates were chanting and dancing at Srivasa-angam and busting out and taking it to the streets, but for the whole Kali-yuga â€“ harinama sankirtana is the yuga-dharma. And not just for the whole yuga, but for every living entity whoâ€™s appearing on Earth. . . .
A large contingency of devotees harp on cow protection because Srila Prabhupada harped on cow protection also. So many times weâ€™ve heard Prabhupada telling how the cow is giving us milk, milk gives finer brain substance for understanding subtle spiritual . . . what subtle? Itâ€™s not so subtle! In the matter of fact, itâ€™s blatantly obvious, and it is staring us in the face. Finer brain substance means what? Milk of the cow gives finer brain substance for understanding. Understanding means understanding what? Finer brain substance means su-medhasah. Understanding means yajnaih sankirtana-prayair yajanti hi su-medhasah (SB 11.5.32). So then we have to see: in Kali-yuga, itâ€™s not possible to satisfy Krishna without satisfying the Kali-yuga-yajna-purusha, who happens to be Lord Caitanya, who is satisfied how? By the performance of the yuga-dharma, harinama sankirtana. So we can sit and armchair-philosophize about varnasrama-dharma all we want and think that weâ€™re doing something wonderful in the matter of setting up our little microcosm among the devotees. But I say, To hell with varnasrama-dharma!
Thereâ€™s no time for cultivating varnasrama-dharma. People who think that there is time for cultivating varnasrama-dharma simply have not understood the philosophy of Krishna consciousness. Maybe they can busy themselves with cultivating varnasrama-dharma, but someone who is actually serious about pursuing the path of suddha-bhakti, who has actually understood the philosophy, realizes that this human form of life is very short. And I have to get from A to C in this one lifetime; itâ€™s going to take focused, single-minded intelligence. Ekeha kuru nandana (BG 2.41). Krishna says, ekeha, one-pointed. And for those who have other things, then bahu-sakha, many branches. This conditional dharma, that conditional dharma . . . whatever. But according to Bhaktivinoda Thakur, someone who wants to actually achieve the terrace of prema should concern himself with the regulative principles of varnasrama-dharma as little as possible and focus his lifeâ€™s energies on performing the yuga-dharma, by which you can hope to get anywhere.
And yuga-dharma means paro-dharma, which means fostering para-bhakti, or raganuga-bhakti, because thatâ€™s what Mahaprabhu came to give by inaugurating the sankirtana movement. The sankirtana movement is a movement meant to spread Vraja-prema, to open the storehouse of Vraja-bhakti and distribute Vraja-bhakti to the most fallen conditioned souls. So that has to be taken into consideration. Sankirtana-yajna is not just anything, any kind of sankirtana. First of all, itâ€™s harinama sankirtana â€“ and not just any kind of harinama sankirtana. Itâ€™s sankirtana of the maha-mantra, because maha-mantra is the tarak-brahma-kirtana-mantra for this age of Kali. There were other mantras, which were the tarak-brahma-kirtana-mantras for other ages. But this Hare-Krishna-maha-mantra happens to be a Radha-Krishna-yugala-vipralambha-mayi, Radha-Krishna-yugala-mantra. The Nimbarkas have Radhe Krishna, Radhe Krishna, Krishna Krishna, Radhe Radhe/ Radhe Syama, Radhe Syama, Syama Syama, Radhe Radhe. This is also a Radha-Krishna-yugala-mantra, but it is sambhoga-mayi. Ours is vipralambha-mayi, which leads to Vraja.
According to Dhyanacandra in Sri Sri Gaura-govinda-arcana-smarana-padyati, the perfection, or you can say fruit, of chanting the maha-mantra is the attainment of Vraja-dhama. Maha-mantra sankirtana is for the purpose of augmenting raga-bhakti, spontaneous devotion, following in the footsteps of the Vraja-vasis, whose devotion is immaculate. It is completely pure, free from any contamination of aisvarya-jnana or mundane karmas or any such things â€“ contamination with the desire for self-satisfaction that you find in realms attained by conditional bhakti.
It is in our guru-parampara, and Srila Prabhupada very clearly stressed unconditional devotion, unalloyed devotion. That means kevala-bhakti. That is our real legacy. When Prabhupada said that half of his work was done, so then everyone went, â€śHuh?â€ť What was the other half, which was not done? So, half of his work was done â€“ but what was his work? To establish the Krishna consciousness movement. To establish the sankirtana movement. Half of his work was done, but we seem to forget that he said that we should maintain what he did. We should not just turn toward the fifty percent which was not done, which some people foolishly have opted to do. They think, â€śWell, what Prabhupada gave, he already did. Thatâ€™s already done. Now we have to focus on what he didnâ€™t do in order to accomplish the fifty percent.â€ť But what was the fifty percent? He expressed that the fifty percent was to establish varnasrama-dharma in the world. So we have already discussed how Prabhupada said it could be done. It could be done by performing harinama sankirtana. Not by going around trying to convince demons that they should be engaged in varnasrama-dharma, establish it by replacing the leadership. As long as the leaders â€“ rakshasas living off the blood of human society â€“ are creating a consumer society and trying to keep everyone in ignorance so that they can sell them their unnecessary so-called necessities, you cannot even begin to think in terms of establishing varnasrama-dharma.
So where is the question of fulfilling Srila Prabhupadaâ€™s fifty percent unless we actually seriously take the formula he advocated for accomplishing that, and thatâ€™s to put the horse before the cart and do your harinama sankirtana, get absorbed in harinama sankirtana by which you yourself will be able to get the higher taste so that you can give up your lower taste so that you wonâ€™t have to concern yourself with thinking in terms of this upadhi or that upadhi? Youâ€™ll actually be above the influence of the three modes of material nature; youâ€™ll actually be above varnasrama as a pure Vaishnava, because you have ruci, harinama ruci, suddha nama ruci. You donâ€™t get suddha nama ruci by not doing harinama sankirtana, please. You understand my point?
Does it make sense to you? Otherwise itâ€™s just show bottle. You forget the actual medicine, the actual nourishment. Itâ€™s a big mistake. The Krishna consciousness movement has been grossly misled, either by ignorant people, shallow people (superficial people who just canâ€™t really get to the essence of what the whole thing is supposed to be all about), or by diabolical people who are purposely, conscientiously trying to undermine the progress of the Krishna consciousness movement from within. Donâ€™t think that that canâ€™t be going on. But at least it shouldnâ€™t go on in our individual life. If we want to become empowered, we have to first of all recognize what is the truth, so that we can present the truth. If we donâ€™t even recognize it, then how are we going to represent the sampradaya? The sampradaya is not a bunch of baboons screwing things up for the spiritual master. Sampradaya means people who are actually absorbed in what the sampradaya is teaching. And what the sampradaya is teaching means the whole gamut of teachings. Varnasrama is a very insignificant aspect of the sampradayaâ€™s teachings.
Devotee: People who are over-emphasizing this varnasrama are just reflecting their own lack of sraddha.
Yes, exactly. Of course, Prabhupada harped on varnasrama at a certain point, and that didnâ€™t indicate his lack of sraddha. But for the most part, devotees who are focusing on that . . . just like for some time there was this, what is it called, social development. This is not the International Society for Social Development, please. And itâ€™s not the International Society for varnasrama-dharma. It is the International society for Krishna consciousness. Or in another way you can say that it is not Lord Caitanyaâ€™s social development movement, itâ€™s not His varnasrama movement, itâ€™s not his cow protection movement, not His baby-making movement, not His International meet-mart movement as we see around the Vrindavana-yatra time and again.
Itâ€™s not really even Lord Caitanyaâ€™s book distribution movement. Book distribution is sankirtana in that it promotes the yuga-dharma harinama sankirtana. The essence of all the sastras is the chanting of the Holy Name. Thatâ€™s the essential message of all the scriptures. The scriptures were made for Kali-yuga rejects like us, who have short memories. They were written down. In previous yugas, they didnâ€™t need to write anything down. There may be one or two who might have written things down, but practically all the brahmacaris were sruti-dhara â€“ they could remember. Most of us brahmacaris in Kali-yuga have hardly any memory at all. Thereâ€™s a few good ones, but we can hardly think that Vyasadeva wrote down the literatures for the people of Kali-yuga without considering the necessity of promoting the currently manifest yuga-dharma. Itâ€™s not that Vyasadeva didnâ€™t know what the yuga-dharma was going to be.
One should engage in the yuga-dharma. And if for some reason one canâ€™t directly engage in nama-sankirtana, then at least he can distribute a few books to encourage other people to come forward to join Mahaprabhuâ€™s sankirtana movement so that they can have the opportunity to engage in the yuga-dharma. I really donâ€™t call this shuffling-your-feet-around at mangala-aratik, hardly even getting off the ground and mumbling a few mantras, as sankirtana. I mean, how much Hare-Krishna maha-mantra kirtana is done during the mangala-aratik or the guru-puja kirtana anyway?
In most Western temples, nobody comes back for the sandhya-aratik in the evening. Theyâ€™re out making money or distributing books or whatever theyâ€™re doing, but theyâ€™re not coming to the temple. So basically, all you have is two kirtanas in the morning program for about twenty-five minutes each. And thatâ€™s all of your lifeâ€™s energies that you are going to offer for the performance of yuga-dharma? And everything else is . . . itâ€™d better be somehow or other connected, supporting temple management. But whatâ€™s temple management? Whatâ€™s the meaning of temple management if the manager doesnâ€™t recognize that the temple is supposed to be a place for people to congregate to perform congregational chanting of the Holy Names? Sweeping the floor â€“ why? So that there is a clean place to come perform nama-sankirtana. Worshipping the Deity - why? Weâ€™re feeding the Deity nicely, decorating Him nicely, making sure that the Deity is not inconvenienced, that at least He is a little comfortable â€“ but why? So that He will stay with us to place His favorable glances on our performances of the yuga-dharma nama-sankirtana.
Because harinama sankirtana is the yuga-dharma. Any other service that doesnâ€™t recognize the subordination to the yuga-dharma can hardly be called service. Rather, it is an anartha.
Devotee: Amazing. In the name of service, one is getting distracted. So, the best thing I can do is to just work to increase my own focus on nama-sankirtana, right?
Yeah, and encourage other people. See, the thing â€“ and one thing our movement is greatly lacking â€“ is the higher taste, which makes people happy. Itâ€™s because theyâ€™re not getting a higher taste that theyâ€™re not happy. And because theyâ€™re not happy, there is so much bickering, so much institutional and inter-institutional quarrel and strife, because theyâ€™re not getting the higher taste. They prefer to busy themselves with all these cyber-wars and all this kind of garbage that is supposed to be so important to philosophically battle each other. Why not philosophically try to understand that if weâ€™re not performing the yuga-dharma, weâ€™re missing the point.
Instead, we must actually surrender â€“ saranagati â€“ on the basis of faith in the purposes of Lord Caitanyaâ€™s advent to inaugurate the sankirtana movement of the Holy Name. Itâ€™s not such a difficult thing to understand if anyone has read any of Srila Prabhupadaâ€™s books.
Devotee: The problem is that people are not reading Prabhupadaâ€™s books now.
Maybe. They may not be reading Prabhupadaâ€™s books. But even people who supposedly do read Srila Prabhupadaâ€™s books â€“ they see what they want to see. They donâ€™t actually read with the necessary receptivity of the disciple. Two things are important: a potent guru and a receptive disciple. Itâ€™s filtering through â€“ they have their own, in-built knowledge filters. They donâ€™t have the adhikara, so they donâ€™t recognize things. The adhikara begins with pure devotional sraddha. Likely, if they didnâ€™t have the adhikara in the beginning, when they started reading the books, itâ€™s due to the fact that many of them are coming into the fold of sat-guruâ€™s association for the first time. So theyâ€™re chanting aparadha-nama. They are not even on the platform of . . . so how much can they see? How much are their clouds of illusion dissipating? They didnâ€™t have sufficient previous association in previous lifetimes; theyâ€™re starting at square one. So you canâ€™t really blame them. Theyâ€™re on the progressive path. In the next lifetime, theyâ€™ll get a better situation and maybe have more su-medhasah to understand the point. So due to lack of sufficient accumulation of bhakti-unmukhi-sukriti from previous lifetimes, their sraddha is weak.
Devotee: Iâ€™m coming back to the same point of the main svarupa; it does say that as far as you donâ€™t have a preacher who practically has pure sraddha, pure devotional service, to preach pure devotional service at all . . .
According to Bhaktivinoda Thakur in Caitanya Sikshamrita, there is jiva-doya â€“ nama-ruci, jiva-doya, and Vaishnava-seva. These three things are important. Nama-ruci is absolutely required. Jiva-doya can be manifest on three levels, but without having nama-ruci, one can hardly be actually doing jiva-doya. Nama-ruci means suddha-nama-ruci; thatâ€™s real ruci. So when suddha-nama-ruci is there, when one is chanting that suddha-nama, you cannot have suddha-nama-ruci unless youâ€™re chanting suddha-nama. So if someone is chanting suddha-nama, then his chanting can actually do good to others. If someone is chanting abhasa-nama, then you do a semblance of good to others. If someone is chanting aparadha-nama, he hardly does any good for others at all. By aparadha-nama, you can fill their bellies; even aparadha-nama will make it rain and make grains grow and solve peopleâ€™s chapatti problems. You will get bhukti â€“ filled belly, gratified, powered by the offended name. So youâ€™re doing that kind of semblance of good.
And the other semblance of good is that youâ€™re freeing the people who hear the abhasa-nama, the abhasa or Vaishnava-abhasa would-be chanting, from sinful reactions so that they gradually become elevated from the tama-guna and raja-guna to the sattva-guna. Then, as they are freed from sinful reactions to the extent that they are situated in the sattva-guna, to that extent, knowledge can be illuminated and they can begin to understand the difference between matter and spirit. But they donâ€™t get bhakti.
The only real good anyone can do for anyone is to infuse bhakti into their hearts by chanting suddha-nama. So those who are chanting suddha-nama are on three levels, and as such, corresponding to those three levels there are three levels of jiva-doya. The devotee at the stage of ruci, suddha-nama-ruci, chanting suddha-nama, is considered a sadhaka. He is not a siddha â€“ he is still a sadhaka â€“ but because he is chanting the pure name, he can plant the seed of pure devotional sraddha within the heart of an ordinary man and gradually help him to come to the platform of ruci by doing anartha-nivritti, etc. But on a higher level are those who are actually siddha, who attain the bhava platform. They can immediately generate nama-ruci within the heart of an ordinary man. In other words, they can purify that soul considerably by the power of their chanting and gradually bring them up to his position.
Bhaktivinoda Thakur says that those who are actually premaka Vaishnavas, their power is not limited and they can immediately, just by glancing, just by good wishes or just by vaca â€“ pronouncing benediction upon someone â€“ they can immediately bring him to the prema platform. So if we want to do any good for anyone, at least we have to be on the platform of chanting suddha-nama as pure devotee sadhakas. A green mango may not be a ripe mango, but at least itâ€™s a mango; itâ€™s the real thing! The ends and the means have to be the same. If youâ€™re not engaged in pure devotional practices, youâ€™re not going to perfect those pure devotional practices to come to the position of pure devotion in perfection. Itâ€™s very simple. If youâ€™re engaging in bhakti-abhasa on the basis of sraddha-abhasa, youâ€™re not going to come to the platform of genuine rati. Youâ€™re going to come to the position of rati-abhasa.
So how important it is â€“ how very few years we have â€“ to accomplish anything. We have to really focus on doing whatever is required to actually get nama-ruci so that we can even hope to begin to do the real jiva-doya. Everyone is harping on para-upakara, para-upakara, para-upakara â€“ you know, gosthi-anandi, para-upakara â€“ but there is no para-upakara unless there is para-bhakti. Para-bhakti means raga-bhakti. There may be upakara, doing something for others. But para-upakara means to act as an agent of the predecessor acaryas in disciplic succession to give the people what the sampradaya is actually set up to give them â€“ the transparent via media! Transparent via media means that you have the eligibility or the adhikara, the qualification, to allow the actual message to come through without putting your little knowledge filter on it or keeping people in the dark as to what is the actual siddhanta of the Gaudiya-sampradaya. So at least we have to help people come to the position of understanding what is the prayojana, the goal. Thereâ€™s no need of understanding the abhideya-tattva unless youâ€™ve already ascertained what is the goal.
So devotees have to become well versed if they want to be actual preachers. They, themselves, have to be well acquainted with the essence of Gaudiya Vaishnava philosophy, both in theory and in realization. In other words, there is no substitute for becoming a realized soul. And thisâ€”becoming fully self-realized soulsâ€”is our first business, putting the horse before the cart in our own lives. At least on the ruci platform itâ€™s possible to recognize our natural intrinsic spiritual inclination toward a particular rasa and be engaged in the pursuit of that bhava. Without pursuing that bhava, how do you expect to get there? First you have to know where youâ€™re going. It doesnâ€™t just automatically happen. Know where youâ€™re going and practice accordingly. Otherwise, thereâ€™s no question of being able to suss out what is favorable or what is unfavorable, because one manâ€™s food is another manâ€™s poison.
So we have to be a little thoughtful about what weâ€™re doing with our human form of life. Our most important duty to the guru parampara is to become fully self-realized so that we can have the fitness to help others become fully self-realized. Because what is the use, what is the meaning? Hereâ€™s a very nice movement for having ample facility for eating, sleeping, mating, and defending? Thereâ€™s enough of that going on. Why should I come to this movement for eating, sleeping, mating, and defending? I was doing fine eating, sleeping, mating, defending out there in the material world. I came to this movement to get something solid, something real, to solve my spiritual dilemma in the matter of my not being able to ascertain the purpose of my life, the purpose of my existence, my being in anxiety on account of not knowing who I am. My abject forgetfulness of Krishna.
Remembrance of Krishna doesnâ€™t mean that you keep a little Krishna on the side over here on the mantle and in the other corner have a big fat color TV. Thatâ€™s not remembering Krishna. It may be a semblance of remembering Krishna, but really remembering Krishna means samadhi. Thatâ€™s real remembrance. And work means working towards accomplishment of samadhi, not just doing any damned thing working. Working, working, working like a workaholic. Samadhi means complete absorption and not just practical samadhi in the sense of absorbing the external body in Krishna sense objects, but absorbing the mind. Complete absorption is not complete unless the mind, the intellect, the consciousness â€“ the whole lock, stock, and barrel taken together is absorbed in Krishna. Samadhi now â€“ work later! The real work â€“ jiva-doya. The real jiva-doya, not the semblance of jiva-doya. Distribute a few books so that people actually get the chance to hear Srila Prabhupadaâ€™s preaching, which is coming from the self-realized platform.
But when they come through the doors of the Krishna consciousness movement, elements within the movement distort the message in this way or that way or the other, completely confusing people and making them wonder whether they have understood what is or is not in the books. Their so-called preacher cannot even figure it out himself. Heâ€™s trying to cram some nonsense down someone elseâ€™s throat in the name of the Krishna consciousness movement and is not allowing them to see what is the actual siddhanta.
Devotee: A very big disaster.
Yes, it is a disaster. Itâ€™s a fiasco. Itâ€™s not like that everywhere, but an awful lot of everywhere is subject to that kind of environmental condition within the context of the Krishna consciousness movement due to immaturity, or due to miserliness, like Dhenukasuraâ€™s. Dhenukasura â€“ neither he could taste tala fruits nor would he allow anyone else to taste them. But our real business is to taste the tala fruit of Vraja-prema and raga-marga bhakti loke korite pracarana. Pracarana means to preach. But to preach what? To preach raga-marga-bhakti loke to the world. Loke means to the world, to the people. Loke means to everyone, and not just to the select few. We may have to judge how much an individual can handle. But the idea is that when youâ€™re called, if you are chosen, you can do real jiva-doya and fulfill Lord Caitanyaâ€™s mission â€“ to elevate people to the platform of raga-bhakti. Thatâ€™s why Lord Caitanya came to this world. The Gosvamis of Vrindavana as well. And their representatives also. But instead, weâ€™ve been satisfied to preach varnasrama-dharma, missing the point, thinking that realization is for another lifetime or something, and disallowing others . . . Dhenukasura syndrome.
Devotee: Is that what Prabhupada meant when he said that all this is boiling the milk?
Yes, exactly. Boiling the milk. Very deeply understand the philosophy from all angles of vision. Then focus on the conclusion and help others get that focus. Thatâ€™s preaching. Not just being satisfied with preaching the rudimentaries but helping others get a higher taste, inspiring them to pursue the goal. Thatâ€™s preaching. And to take to the process by which they can most easily attain the goal, which is harinama sankirtana coupled with bhagavata-sravana and prasada distribution. Book distribution means bhagavata-sravana kirtana. Five angas are most important: dhama-vasa, bhagavata-sravana kirtana, nama sankirtana, sri murti seva, and sadhu-sanga (but real sadhu-sanga, not just any damned thing that wears kanthi-mala and tilaka).
You can find the philosophy in the books. Everyone has the right to exercise his own intelligence. But some fall under the sway of so-called preachers who think they have to keep everyone under their thumb; they are too wimpy to use their own intelligence, unduly surrendering it to someone else without actually weighing the consequences. But anyone who has a little bit of intelligence certainly can ascertain the actual essence of the scriptures that he is reading. It is not so difficult. Even before someone takes initiation, itâ€™s not impossible to do considerable anartha-nivritti. Anartha-nivritti is not just had by not doing bhajana, please.
Devotee: I was thinking in terms of this knowledge filter you mentioned before, not having the proper adhikara. Then we only get the book on sankirtana and they see what they want to see . . . unless someone comes and inculcates them . . .
And even then, they have to be willing to accept itâ€”and live by it in order to actually realize the value of the thing. They have to have enough faith. Itâ€™s not that someone can come along and put something in our eyes, but if you want to be an owl . . . as soon as he is gone somewhere else, then immediately your eyes are closed again.
Anyway, thatâ€™s my angle on it. One boy asked Srila Prabhupada, â€śSrila Prabhupada, I have read in your books that itâ€™s possible for a man in Vedic society to have more than one wife.â€ť And Prabhupada answered, â€śOh, is that what youâ€™re reading my books for?â€ť I love that anecdote because it is a classic example. You can find so many things, but you can also find the essence.
So there are two kinds of devotees. Thereâ€™s sara-grahi; sara means essence, which heâ€™s drinking. Then thereâ€™s bhara-grahi, ass-like devotees, carrying around heaps and piles of anarthas. Bhaktivinoda Thakur recommends that we should, if we havenâ€™t already, become sara-grahi. And we should encourage others become sara-grahi. That will help improve the situation. The more essence drinkers there are around us, the better quality of sadhu-sanga weâ€™re going to have. Otherwise itâ€™s sadhu-sanga-less, not real sadhu-sanga. Real sadhu-sanga means real sadhu. And real sadhu means pure devotee. Not that when Srila Prabhupada said that all of his disciples were pure devotees did he mean that any damned fool who supposedly took some kind of farcical initiation was a pure devotee. It meant, â€śAll of my disciples.â€ť
So what constitutes â€śdiscipleâ€ť? Then you will understand what is pure devotee. Itâ€™s funny how people misconstrue things. â€śAll of my disciples are pure devotees.â€ť Who is so audacious as that to claim to actually be his disciple? You know, I have been struggling for the last thirty-five years to try to become even some kind of a disciple. And a real disciple is an accomplished disciple, not just blathering in the woods. Real sadhu-sanga means associating with real pure devotees, at least at the lower order of a pure devotee, sadhaka, who is actually chanting suddha-nama, who has profound taste for pure devotional practices, governed by guru, sastra, and sadhu. At least that.
After all, life is very short. To be honest with you â€“ although it may sound sacrilegious â€“ first Iâ€™d like to give a damn whether varnasrama ever got established. What I want to see is inspired harinama sankirtana. My understanding is that it is the penance for all ills. harinama sankirtana, prasadam distribution, and philosophy for the classes. That doesnâ€™t mean that harinama sankirtana is not for the classes. harinama sankirtana is for the masses which includes the classes, please. You know, some people have this concept that, â€śharinama sankirtana, oh thatâ€™s for the masses. We are the philosophers of Krnsa consciousness; thatâ€™s not for us.â€ť Especially harinama sankirtana is for the rasika Vaishnavas. They are the ones who would appreciate harinama sankirtana the most, because they are absorbed in the relishing of rasa. So they can actually understand what kirtana-rasa is. Philosophers can try to anthropologically analyze the thing, but the masses donâ€™t know what hit them. The real relishers of harinama sankirtana are the most elevated devotees. And thatâ€™s what weâ€™re supposed to be trying to become. Weâ€™re supposed to be trying to become uttama-adhikaris, which includes cultivating the vision of an uttama-adhikari. Then we can actually do something. Otherwise, they, the disciples, will not be able to easily advance to their ultimate goal of life under our insufficient guidance, as Srila Prabhupada mentioned in The Nectar of Instruction. We want to do good for others. But first do good to yourself. The doctor heals . . .
Devotee: It seems that many people think itâ€™s easy and convenient to preach Krishna consciousness practically.
But they didnâ€™t actually practice. Itâ€™s easier to pat themselves on the back, giving themselves credits for doing what Prabhupada wanted us to do. Itâ€™s a preaching movement. But what constitutes preaching, please? Preaching means to inculcate, to infuse inspiration for devotional service, bhakti â€“ means suddha-bhakti, to actually impregnate the heart with bhakti-sakti. Thatâ€™s actual preaching. If weâ€™re doing anything less than that, then we canâ€™t satisfy ourselves that weâ€™re ISKCON preachers.
Devotee: One has to be really fortunate to get to the right conclusion.
Yes â€“ bhagyavan-jiva. You donâ€™t get to the right conclusion unless you actually come into the fold of the sampradaya. But the sampradaya doesnâ€™t mean people who are distorting the image. Itâ€™s not that all the deformities are the sampradaya any more than stools and dead bodies falling into the Ganga are the Ganga. You get something substantial by bathing in the Ganga. But we donâ€™t bathe in the stools. We donâ€™t bathe in the dead bodies. Those things are brushed aside in order to get the essence. So if we canâ€™t even understand the difference between the Ganga and the dead bodies and stools floating, then how are we going to know whether or not weâ€™re actually contacting the sampradaya?
The institution is like the car. And the sampradaya is like the owner of the car. If the car becomes dysfunctional because certain constituents of its make-up no longer facilitate its purpose in conveying us from one place to another, then the owner has to dump the thing and get some other, either a new car or another form of transportation. It is the substance that has to be transported â€“ with the assistance of the institution.
Sampradaya is the substance â€“ itâ€™s the school of thought, the essential teachings. Thatâ€™s what distinguishes one sampradaya from another. One luminary in a particular disciplic line may have proper light on certain teachings, which will be seen as sampradaya. So there is the Gaudiya sampradaya, there is the Ramanuja sampradaya, there is . . . Ramanuja was the vehicle through which those teachings manifest to the world. Similarly, any institution or group of people or individual within the institution, any constituent of the institution, can act only as a vehicle â€“ an agent or an instrument, in other words â€“ to carry the essential substance, the essential teachings, from the sampradaya for the benefit of others. Therefore the members of the institution have to be properly lined up with the purpose of the sampradaya. Otherwise, everything breaks down.
But itâ€™s not that Lord Caitanyaâ€™s purpose is not going to be fulfilled. He commended that His name would be heard in every town and village all over the world. How often weâ€™ve heard Prabhupada say that we take His statement lightly, donâ€™t consider the whole thing very deeply. Not that we take the credit. Prabhupada gives us the example that Krishna tells Arjuna that all the soldiers at Kurksetra are already put to death by Him. Arjuna was only an instrument in the fight. And if Krishna wants to give the credit to someone, it doesnâ€™t necessarily mean He wants to give the credit to us. He has no objection to giving the credit to us if we will comply with the requirements to merit being given that credit. But if we fall short for not being a transparent via-medium, if the image becomes distorted and apa-sampradaya manifests due to apa-siddhanta coming across, then the vision of Lord Caitanya is not going to be checked by us, any more than the Ganges is going to be checked by a big boulder. Just as the Ganges seeks the path of least resistance, similarly the sampradaya seeks the path of least resistance. What is the resistance? All of our material attachments, our anarthas â€“ whatever is obstructing the actual truth from manifesting.
Devotee: We have the option to choose the truth. Otherwise . . .
Yes, thatâ€™s the proper use of our free will. Weâ€™re given the opportunity to act as a servant of Krishna but if we want to continue to serve maya, then so much apa-siddhanta will come, dabbling out of our mouthing-off mouth, mouthing various bogus misrepresentations of the philosophy in the name of the philosophy of Krishna consciousness. So either maya or Krishna. The choice is always there. You can either serve to represent what is actually Krishna consciousness or you can serve the misrepresentations. Regardless, youâ€™ll also be part of the perfect arrangement of Krishna, because there are some people who require to be cheated in this lifetime in order to become frustrated enough to take it seriously in the next lifetime.
So everything is a perfect arrangement. Youâ€™re either this part of the perfect arrangement or that part of the perfect arrangement. But itâ€™s all Krishnaâ€™s perfect arrangement. Itâ€™s just a question of which aspect of that arrangement we want to serve. But by serving one aspect, you get one result, and by serving another aspect, you get another result. So if you want to present watered-down philosophy so as to somehow or other either boast your own self-esteem, satisfying yourself that youâ€™re doing something wonderful, because after all, â€śWeâ€™re the next acaryas, so we also have rights to change things according to our conceptions of what we see to be pertinent to time and circumstance.â€ť So we take license, nivritti, to water things down, and people donâ€™t get the real thingâ€”at least, they donâ€™t get it from us. They might, by their own good fortune, run into another agent â€“ hari, guru, Vaishnava, Bhagavata-gita, something â€“ read something in another book which makes them understand that whatever is being preached over here is bogus.
So you can teach them all about varnasrama-dharma! [laughter] Teach them that itâ€™s only important insofar as it may help to keep peace in human society. But the real peace formula is:
jnatva mam santim ricchati
His friendliness towards the living entities is most dynamically and dramatically manifest in the form of Caitanya Mahaprabhu, who is the most munificent avatara, who came to inaugurate the process of nama sankirtana as the expression of his highest friendliness toward the living entities in this age of Kali, because thatâ€™s nama sankirtana. Thatâ€™s actually his way of propagating the prema-dharma. Everything else starts to make sense when you see everything is subordinate or subservient to the yuga-dharma in this age of Kali.
Itâ€™s like if I have an infection and I want to cure the infection so that I can be healthy so I can live a normal, happy life, then itâ€™s not going to work, itâ€™s not going to happen, if I only take one tablet a week or one tablet every month or two. I need to take sufficient dosage, sufficiently frequent dosage, in order for the medicine to have its superlative effect. Certainly, itâ€™s not enough just to do lip service to some token compliance with the sankirtana principle once in a blue moon. It should be a regular dosage.
The temple programs â€“ coming to see the mangala-aratik, the Deity â€“ are to force us . . . you know, the force of the rule: everyone must come to mangala-aratik means that everyone must come to do sankirtana before the Deity. Itâ€™s not like the Deity is important and the sankirtana is non-important. Both are important, but of the two, the more important is the sankirtana. Deity worship is the yuga-dharma for a previous yuga. But now in Kali-yuga, sankirtana has taken the helm so to speak. So if someone is living in the temple and coming for the morning program â€“ to the extent that theyâ€™re putting their energy into it, instead of just coming and standing around moping, wondering why theyâ€™re there (then maybe they wonâ€™t get the same out of it as if they were actually enthusiastically chanting and dancing in the sankirtana) â€“ thatâ€™s when the fun starts. Thatâ€™s actually when you start making advancement. When you start spontaneously going out and performing harinama sankirtana not because youâ€™re forced by the rule but because you know that itâ€™s pleasing to Lord Caitanya and you want to please Lord Caitanya. And you know that itâ€™s pleasing to your guru. If itâ€™s not pleasing to your guru, then he is not your guru â€“ as simple as that.