Comments Posted By Babaji
Displaying 1 To 3 Of 3 Comments
A response to Hari-kirtana prabhu regarding my article
“Prabhupada: In, actually, in Bengal, Bengal has lost its original culture. In other provinces the brahmana class, they are keeping very strictly the original culture. Even a brahmana would not accept foodstuff prepared by his wife, because woman is considered sudra. The woman, when she becomes the wife of a brahmana, then she is called brahmani, but she’s not offered brahminical culture. She remains as sudra. So therefore a strict brahmana does not accept foodstuff prepared by his wife. Still there are in U.P. The wife will arrange for cooking, and he’ll sit down and cook dal, capatis. Then he will eat, and whatever remains, that is there, that will be taken by her. But he will not take foodstuff cooked by his even wife.” Room Conversation–August 2, 1976, New Mayapur (French farm)
Comment Posted By Babaji On 14.08.2006 @ 16:40
Atmarama is not correct it is not that chanting on fingers is more pure than chanting on beads, it is just another way of counting. But it is usually for smaller number of things. Like doing gayatri japa for instance. Nama-acarya, that is the Acarya of how to chant the holy name, Hari dasa Thakura chanted on beads, not his fingers.
I have used a clicker, it is a must when driving. But nothing beats chanting on Tulsi beads. Simply by touching Tulsi one makes advancment what to speak of chant the Holy name.
Comment Posted By Babaji On 07.08.2006 @ 14:56
Impartial We Stand Biased We Fall
Finally a voice of reason. How refreshingly different from Malati dasi.
Comment Posted By Babaji On 26.07.2006 @ 06:50
«« Back to the Comments Members Stats Page
«« Back to the Dandavats Website General Stats Page
