Hare Krishna.
There are two major problems with this presentation above.
The first is there is no such commodity as "Ahimsa Milk", there is no evidence positively in Guru, Sadhu and Shastra that milk produced in a Cow Protection situation becomes Ahimsa. In fact the evidence from Srila Prabhupada shows there is no Ahimsa in any food product whatsoever. Srimad Bhagavatam3.29.15.
Secondly the Milk that is produced from a Cow Protection project should never be sold as a capitalistic commodity. The main idea in Cow Protection is to support a self-sufficient economic situation within the dynamic of community. In other words the community live by the milk not make a business and absolutely don't sell it. This whole presentation suffers from what can only be described as lack of "informed consent".
In other words WHO consented to milk being described as Ahimsa, WHO authorised this labelling??
Hare Krishna!Where do you get the idea that milk from protected cows is not ahimsa. If you say SB 3.29.15, it is simply your own twist that you project this purport to milking cows, by which I suppose you advocate vegan lifestyle, which in turn is demonic.
And why not sell the milk? This is how cows maintain themselves, their keepers and the community? Let's not go back to primal communist terrorism.
Hare Krishna.
There are two major problems with this presentation above.
The first is there is no such commodity as "Ahimsa Milk", there is no evidence positively in Guru, Sadhu and Shastra that milk produced in a Cow Protection situation becomes Ahimsa. In fact the evidence from Srila Prabhupada shows there is no Ahimsa in any food product whatsoever. Srimad Bhagavatam3.29.15.
Secondly the Milk that is produced from a Cow Protection project should never be sold as a capitalistic commodity. The main idea in Cow Protection is to support a self-sufficient economic situation within the dynamic of community. In other words the community live by the milk not make a business and absolutely don't sell it. This whole presentation suffers from what can only be described as lack of "informed consent".
In other words WHO consented to milk being described as Ahimsa, WHO authorised this labelling??
Hare Krishna!Where do you get the idea that milk from protected cows is not ahimsa. If you say SB 3.29.15, it is simply your own twist that you project this purport to milking cows, by which I suppose you advocate vegan lifestyle, which in turn is demonic.
And why not sell the milk? This is how cows maintain themselves, their keepers and the community? Let's not go back to primal communist terrorism.